RE: Psudo WG Last Call for: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/d raft -ietf-ops-taddress-mib-02.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Juergen answers me:
> Bert> - I wonder if the comment just before TransportAddressType would
> Bert> not be better put within the DESCRIPTION claise of that TC?
> 
> My intention here was to remind the MIB editor (me at the moment, but
> that might change) to keep these definitions somewhat aligned. The
> intention was not to tell everyone that these will necessarily be
> aligned. Hence, I thought a comment would be appropriate rather than
> text in the description clause. But I am flexible - if people prefer
> this text in the DESCRIPTION clause, fine with me. Who has a strong
> opinion about this?
> 
Aha... that was/is not so clear from the document.
Not sure yet what I would prefer. I think Mike Heard
had a question on the practical implications of this
The answer to that question is an important one...
Can we see that answer? Or did you send it and did I miss it?

Bert
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder    
<http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>