[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: deleteTCB in the TCP-MIB

To: moulton@snmp.com
Subject: Re: deleteTCB in the TCP-MIB
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 15:56:15 +0100
Cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200202261610.LAA29413@seymour39.SNMP.COM> (message from SteveMoulton on Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:10:38 -0500)
References: <200202261610.LAA29413@seymour39.SNMP.COM>


>>>>> Steve Moulton writes:

Steve> .  Why is RFC 2012 resurfacing now?  Practically speaking,
Steve> shouldn't it have been republished or perished by now?  I've
Steve> not seen any signs of interest.

RFC 2012 has been used as a model for the SCTP-MIB.

The SCTP-MIB also features a deleteTCB for SCTP associations and the
question was whether our experience with the TCP-MIB says it is a good
thing to have.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder      University of Osnabrueck
<schoenw@inf.uos.de>       Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science
Phone: +49 541 969 2483    Albrechtstr. 28, 49069 Osnabrueck, Germany
Fax:   +49 541 969 2770    <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/>

References:
- Re: deleteTCB in the TCP-MIB
  - From: Steve Moulton <moulton@snmp.com>

Prev by Date: Re: query
Next by Date: normative vs. informative references in MIB boilerplate
Previous by thread: Re: deleteTCB in the TCP-MIB
Next by thread: Re: deleteTCB in the TCP-MIB
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread