Re: draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv4survey-01.txt

[Randy Presuhn <rpresuhn@dorothy.bmc.com>]

Hi -

> Message-ID: <2413FED0DFE6D111B3F90008C7FA61FB0D3DACAA@nl0006exch002u.nl.lucent.com>
> From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
> To: mibs@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv4survey-01.txt
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 16:58:02 +0200
> 
> MIB authors and proponents may want to check this document.
> It tries to give a summary of whihc RFCs are IPv4 dependent.
> I think there are a number of errors in this document,
> specifically in the MIB space.
> 
> I have tried to address these sections, which are all incorrect
> I think (a copy of my email is on ngtrans mailing list and archives):
> 
>   3.58
>   4.64
>   5.367
>   5.441
>   5.537
> 
> I am sure there are more MIB or SNMP related documents that have
> not been correctly evaluated. How about if authors of specific
> RFCs take a look at them?
...

I've forwarded the relevant text to the disman WG mailing list
for its MIBs.

 ------------------------------------------------------
 Randy Presuhn          BMC Software, Inc.  1-3141
 randy_presuhn@bmc.com  2141 North First Street
 Tel: +1 408 546-1006   San Jose, California 95131  USA
 ------------------------------------------------------
 My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
 ------------------------------------------------------