[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv4survey-01.txt

MIB authors and proponents may want to check this document.
It tries to give a summary of whihc RFCs are IPv4 dependent.
I think there are a number of errors in this document,
specifically in the MIB space.

I have tried to address these sections, which are all incorrect
I think (a copy of my email is on ngtrans mailing list and archives):

  3.58
  4.64
  5.367
  5.441
  5.537

I am sure there are more MIB or SNMP related documents that have
not been correctly evaluated. How about if authors of specific
RFCs take a look at them?

Bert