Re: INET-ADDRESS-MIB

[David Harrington <dbh@enterasys.com>]

Hey guys,

I think you two are talking past one another.

I think Jon was asking that Juergen post the updated draft here as well as sending
it to the I-D editor, so the people on this list will it have a day or two sooner
than it would otherwise be available.

I think Jon was not proposing that Juergen not send it to the I-D editor.

I think Juergen is saying that there is no substantial difference between the
revision and the existing available draft, merely some cosmetic changes, so there
isn't anything worthwhile to review in the extra day or two gained.

Am I reading this correctly?
dbh

Jon Saperia wrote:

> >
> > >>>>> Jon Saperia writes:
> >
> > >>  What are you waiting for which is not already in
> > >> <draft-ietf-ops-rfc2851-update-00.txt>?
> >
> > Jon> Your previous note led me to believe that this was going to be
> > Jon> updated. Perhaps I misunderstood.  /jon
> >
> > Yes, it will be updated. But most of the updates will be textual
> > descriptions rather than new definitions - so I was curious why this
> > blocks an ID from being submitted.
> >
> > /js
> >
> >
> Juergen, this sounds like a question for Bert. You said updates will be
> textual descriptions rather than new definitions. Depending on the changes you
> expect they will be small or large changes.
>
> Thanks,
> /jon
> --
>
> Jon Saperia                  saperia@jdscons.com
>                              Phone: 617-744-1079
>                              Fax:   617-249-0874
>                              http://www.jdscons.com/

--
---
David Harrington            Network Management Standards Architect
dbh@enterasys.com           Office of the CTO
+1 603 337 2614 - voice     Enterasys Networks
+1 603 332 1524 - fax       Rochester NH, USA