Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-lace-00.txt

["James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>]

Let me rewrite second paragraph:

Hence, this discussion is probably more appropriate in the testbed mailing
list hosted by Verisign. The WG is interested in the testbed results but I
dont think the interest stretch to solve specific problems for any testbed or
companies.

-James "dont write email when you sleeping :-)" Seng


----- Original Message -----
From: "James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>
To: "Rick H Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>; "Harald Alvestrand"
<Harald@Alvestrand.no>
Cc: "Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@walid.com>; "Paul Hoffman / IMC"
<phoffman@imc.org>; <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-lace-00.txt


> This is a specific problem for Verisign Testbed.
>
> I do not see the significant of discussing this particular 'problem' in IDN
> WG. If (i mean a BIG IF) there is an ACE solution, then there should be one
> defined prefix.
>
> Hence, this discussion is probably more appropriate in the testbed mailing
> list in Verisign. The WG are interest in the testbed but I dont think
interest
> to solve specific problem for any testbed or company.
>
> -James Seng
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rick H Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>
> To: "Harald Alvestrand" <Harald@Alvestrand.no>
> Cc: "Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@walid.com>; "Paul Hoffman / IMC"
> <phoffman@imc.org>; <idn@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 6:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-lace-00.txt
>
>
> >
> > Harald,
> >
> > changing the prefix will not be easy operationally, the move from ra-- to
> > bq-- had operational and political hurdles. Changing to the next prefix
> > will require coordination between the Registry, Registrars, Multi lingual
> > Technology Providers, and any one else whom happened to write some
> > software that used the prefix 'bq--'
> >
> > I think someone really needs to write a draft criteria explaining what the
> > requirements are for a "testbed" so that this situation *never* happens
> > again.
> >
> > -rick
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> >
> > > At 20:26 08/11/2000 +0000, Brian W. Spolarich wrote:
> > > >On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
> > > >
> > > >| Maybe when we start comparing ACEs, we should use different prefixes
> > > >| for each.
> > > >
> > > >   How about '<n>q--', where N is an identifier chosen by the ACE draft
> > > >author?
> > >
> > > I think each RACE draft should choose a different prefix, with no
special
> > > considerations.
> > > I think it is the clear consensus of the group, the authors and the WG
> > > chairs that the prefix of the final (single) RFC shold NOT be ANY of the
> > > ones in the I-D; using different prefixes for each draft helps
> experimentation.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
> > > +47 41 44 29 94
> > > Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>