[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] IDNRA comments



At 07:52 AM 9/1/00 +0800, James Seng wrote:
>A twist in the same argument but would make good sense too :-)
>
>Care to doc this down in an I-D? We need a transition doc.

Frankly, I am hoping that someone will first solve item 6, like making 
quoted-printable have a usable "pretty" format.  I believe the benefit, in 
this case, would be enormous.


>Dave Crocker wrote:
> >
> > 6.  It would be wonderful to have ACE produce an ASCII encoding that is
> > tolerable to human, but that probably requires wasting too many characters
> > in a domain field to be acceptable.  (To re-invoke the MIME model, the
> > difference in similar to the intention behind quoted-printable, versus
> > bin64; unfortunately, quoted-printable has proved ineffective.)