[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Unicode tagging

At 11:30 16/08/00, Edmon wrote:
>DNSSEC is extremely important but I dont think anything have to change, 
>at least not because of the use of DNSII.

Are you stating a requirement or are you making an assertion ?

I think that is good to require that IDNs be compatible with DNSSEC.
It isn't obvious to me that all possible IDN proposals meet such
a requirement, however.  Any successful IDN proposal needs to make
it clear that it will work with DNSSEC and also the details of
how it works with DNSSEC, IMHO.

Ran