Re: [idn] [Fwd: IDN requirements]

[James Seng <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

Spoke briefly to Brian. His primary concern is that we should consider
how IDN can phase into the existing system without too major changes.

-James Seng

Marc Blanchet wrote:
> 
> At/À 23:38 2000-07-17 +0800, James Seng you wrote/vous écriviez:
> >We receive the following comment from Brian on the requirement I-D. Any
> >suggestions?
> 
> I agree with all. Marc.
> 
> >-James Seng
> >
> >--- CUT HERE ---
> >2.1, requirement [1]
> >
> >I think there is another point here (one that we also had to add into
> >the IPv6 requirements at an early stage). There must be a *stepwise*
> >deployment plan, i.e. it must be possible to deploy the solution one
> >server at a time and one client at a time. A non-updated client must
> >be able to use an updated server, an updated client must be able to use
> >a non-updated server, and queries and zone transfers must be possible
> >between updated and non-updated servers in both directions.  I think
> >this is really part of requirement [1] rather then a separate one.
> 
> Marc Blanchet
> Viagénie inc.
> tel: 418-656-9254
> http://www.viagenie.qc.ca
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Normos (http://www.normos.org): Internet standards portal:
> IETF RFC, drafts, IANA, W3C, ATMForum, ISO, ... all in one place.