[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]

To: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>, bill@mail.nic.nu (J. William Semich), James Seng <jseng@pobox.org.sg>, RJ Atkinson <rja@inet.org>, keka@im.se
Subject: Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@swip.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:22:20 +0200
Cc: idn@ops.ietf.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:26:42 -0700
Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com

At 09.15 -0700 00-06-28, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
>"The protocol MUST specify canonicalization, it MUST specify exactly 
>where in the DNS that canonicalization happens and does not happen, 
>it MUST specify how additions to ISO 10646 will affect the stability 
>of the DNS and the amount of work done on the root DNS servers."

Great!

  paf

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
Next by Date: RE: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
Prev by thread: Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
Next by thread: RE: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread