[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Name forms in the requirements doc
- To: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>, idn@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: [idn] Name forms in the requirements doc
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 20:40:55 +0200
- Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:47:51 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
At 09:43 19.06.2000 -0700, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
>At 10:45 AM +0200 6/19/00, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>>All digit segments *are* allowed, and in common use in Chinese .com domains,
>>for some reason.
>>The domainname i--d.com is also registered (by someone in Vienna).
>>So I think both restrictions are false and should not be deleted.
>
>"Should not" or "should"?
ouch - "should not be mentioned" or "should be deleted".
unable to keep my mind on one opinion for the length of the sentence....
Harald
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no