>Marc Blanchet wrote:
>
> > If we are stuck too long on the requirements, we will
> > never have a standard. Worst, we will have 20 standards
> > deployed. Then at that time, trying to refine requirements
> > will be waste of time: we will have to take care of the
> > current deployed "standards" and try to make one out of
> > them. Much more difficult.
>
>I agree with what Marc has written. Although this is a complex issue, we
>need to find ways to expedite the acceptance of a standard. There are
>already several "standards" being deployed and if unless we move this
>process along there will be many others.
>
>Regards, Russ (rrolfe)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Marc Blanchet
>[<mailto:Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca>mailto:Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca]
>Sent: Sun, June 11, 2000 6:29 AM
>To: Eugene M. Kim; GIM Gyeongseog-KIM Kyongsok
>Cc: idn@ops.ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [idn] case folding
>
>At/À 02:31 2000-06-11 -0700, Eugene M. Kim you wrote/vous écriviez:
> >I would like to leave this issue open for a while; it wouldn't be too
> >late after we look at how different proposals deal with it.
>
>I agree with this view.
>
>We should make room in the requirements, in order to have some space for
>engineering decisions. This idn problem is not simple, and it is pretty
>clear from our discussions that the solution will be some sort of
>compromise. We were able to discuss requirements mostly because we had many
>proposals on the plate to discuss. We should be able to review different
>alternatives, so we need not to tight requirements too much.
>
>If we are stuck too long on the requirements, we will never have a
>standard. Worst, we will have 20 standards deployed. Then at that time,
>trying to refine requirements will be waste of time: we will have to take
>care of the current deployed "standards" and try to make one out of them.
>Much more difficult.
>
>Marc.
>
> >Regards,
> >Eugene Kim
> >
> >On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, GIM Gyeongseog-KIM Kyongsok wrote:
> >
> >| On Mon, 29 May 2000, Brian W. Spolarich wrote:
> >|
> >| > On Mon, 29 May 2000, Maurizio Codogno wrote:
> >| >
> >| > | What about saying that the only case folding is [A-Z][a-z], for
> >| > | backward compatibility with present DNS?
> >|
> >| considering that case folding seems quite complicated,
> >| i like the above idea.
> >|
> >| as pointed out by somebody else (who?),
> >| cases do matter on Unix systems.
> >|
> >|
> >| ±è °æ¼®, ºÎ»ê´ë Á¤º¸ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ °øÇкÎ;
> >| KIM Kyongsok/GIM Gyeongseog, Busan National Univ.
> >| gimgs@hangeul.cs.pusan.ac.kr,
> <http://hangeul.cs.pusan.ac.kr/hangeul/>http://hangeul.cs.pusan.ac.kr/hangeul/
> >| Ph: +82-(0)51-510-2292, Fax: +82-(0)51-515-2208
> >|
> >|
> >
> >--
> >Eugene M. Kim <ab@astralblue.com>
> >
> >"Is your music unpopular? Make it popular; make music
> >which people like, or make people who like your music."
>
>Marc Blanchet
>Viagénie inc.
>tel: 418-656-9254
><http://www.viagenie.qc.ca>http://www.viagenie.qc.ca
>
>----------------------------------------------------------
>Normos (http://www.normos.org): Internet standards portal:
>IETF RFC, drafts, IANA, W3C, ATMForum, ISO, ... all in one place.
Marc Blanchet
Viagénie inc.
tel: 418-656-9254
http://www.viagenie.qc.ca
----------------------------------------------------------
Normos (http://www.normos.org): Internet standards portal:
IETF RFC, drafts, IANA, W3C, ATMForum, ISO, ... all in one place.