Re: [idn] Requirements I-D

[James Seng <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

Or perhaps to be a devil advocate, why even bother with canonicalization? Why
not let the user register X number of times. 

(I am sure the registry and registrar would love it altho everyone else will
feel it is a rip-off :-))))

-James Seng

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> 
> At 11:07 18.05.2000 -0700, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
> >The character repertoire that is allowed in IDN is exactly that of ISO
> >10646 at the time we finish IDN. There is a single case-mapping table, a
> >single canonicalization table, and so on, at that point.
> 
> this requires that the time we finish IDN is significantly far out into the
> future, since ISO has so far not come to agreement on a single case-mapping
> table.
> 
> Just tweaking.
> 
>                   Harald
> 
> --
> Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
> Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no