Re: [idn] RE: An idn protocolfor consideration in making the req uirements

[James Seng <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

Karlsson Kent - keka wrote:
> Maybe that is a 'strong' statement, but without such a
> goal we may very likely get a 'solution' that will lead
> to problems that a) there is no end to, and b) some think
> aren't problems no matter how problematic they are.

Once again, you are not getting my message. So please repeat after
me again: We are not a standard track working group.

Moving on, some of your concerns you point out in the last email
makes good requirement and I will see how I can in-corporate it
in the next version. 

-James Seng