[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Requirements: sorting
- To: "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Subject: Re: [idn] Requirements: sorting
- From: Patrik Fältström <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 20:48:02 +0100
- Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 11:50:38 -0800
- Envelope-to: email@example.com
--On 2000-02-03 08.14 -0800, "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I couldn't find any requirement in RFC 1034 or RFC 1035 that required
> sorting by names. Is this requirement in any other DNS standard?
DNSSEC requires sorting for the NXT records, but the sorting can be based
on binary values (for example in the case of 10646 the code point itself,
i.e. U+0345 > U+0344), as it is not intended to be consumed by humans, but
to detect where "no records exists".