Re: [idn] Re: An idn protocol for consideration in making the requirements

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>]

At 18:24 02.02.00 +0800, James Seng wrote:
>Hi Dan,
>
>While this is really out of topic for the moment, it is really pointless to
>flame other people proposal because your own personal belief of "how things
>must be done". To be more constructive and proactive, I would suggest you try
>writing a proposal for IDN in UTF-8 instead.

And of course, if reasons behind the argument for and against encoding can 
be formulated as requirements and put into the requirements doc, that would 
be a Good Thing.
I think that at this stage, the requirements doc SHOULD contain conflicting 
requirements, clearly marked as such where we know that they are, so that 
the discussion on the list and in Adelaide can decide that one should be 
chosen, the other should be chosen, or that there is no requirement here.

                     Harald

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no