Re: GRE over CLNP draft?

[David Meyer <dmm@cisco.com>]

	The only things that jump out at me are:

	(i).	"Tunnelling" is misspelled

	(ii).	No RFC2119 boiler plate 

	(iii).	Incorrect reference ([1] and [2]), taking first author
		as editor

	(iv).   Is it possible that when tunneling IP of CLNP
		that one could run into something analogous to
		the PMTU problem that we have when tunneling over
		IPv4 (someone sets the DF bit but you can't find
		the source to send the ICMP back to, so you
		create a black hole), either inside the tunnel,
		or otherwise? I'm not sure.


	Most of these are cosmetic, however. I don't have a problem
	with this.

	BTW, what are the issues with citing ISO/IEC, ITU, or 
	Belcore documents in internet drafts, if any?


	Dave


According to Erik Nordmark:
> 
> 
> Has anybody on this list looked at draft-christian-gre-over-clnp-00.txt
> and have any opinions to share?
> 
> Seems harmless to me.
> 
>    Erik
> 
> 
>