[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Call for censensus on path forward
I would really like to hear from a few operators (or
even NM application developers) if they indeed find it
a requirement to do polling a 1-second-granularty.
It does not sound realistic to me... but who is me?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glenn Mansfield Keeni [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: zaterdag 21 september 2002 13:19
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Call for censensus on path forward
.. snip ..
> But then why do we need to look at traffic at 1 second intervals?
> If we are managing a reasonably fast network, and doing serious
> management - then we probably need to look at traffic at even
> smaller intervals. I will cite just two of the instances that we
> have actually encountered.
> a. Traffic graphs for a Gigabit network polled at, say, 1 minute
> intervals are USELESS. What we end up seeing is the traffic
> averaged over a minute! One never sees that real traffic
> characteristics from these graphs. [Isn't there anyone out there
> monitoring a high speed network ? I would be interested to know
> how you do it.]
> b. Our security applications need high resolution traffic monitoring.
> There can be a sustained stealth DoS attack that is disrupting the
> network and seriously degrading its performance (with short and
> sharp bursts traffic) yet not a flicker shows on the
> traffic graphs
> to tell about the attack i.e. if you are monitoring at 5 minutes,
> 1 minute or even several second intervals!
> I would love to hear your comments.