[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CDN Peering Architecture Overview <draft-green-cdnp-gen-arch-01.txt> available
- To: Gary Tomlinson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: CDN Peering Architecture Overview <draft-green-cdnp-gen-arch-01.txt> available
- From: Barron Housel <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:51:44 -0400
- CC: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:52:18 -0700
- Envelope-to: email@example.com
Wouldn't "DIRECTING" be preferred over "DIRECTION" because "direction" is a
noun whereas "directing" is a participle showing action.
Gary Tomlinson wrote:
> The CDN Peering Architecture Overview ID
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-green-cdnp-gen-arch-01.txt> has
> been updated to rev 01 and is now available at IETF (HTML is also available
> at http://www.content-peering.org/draft-green-cdnp-gen-arch-01.html).
> I believe this version incorporates all of the changes and suggestions made
> at the 10/3 meeting along with comments received subsequently. At this
> point, the consensus of the design team is we are ready to drill down and
> begin tackling the tougher machinery issues involved in each of the systems
> (DIRECTION, DISTRIBUTION, ACCOUNTING). A lively discussion has begun on
> accounting, so we are making progress. Work on a new ID "Known CDN
> Redirection Mechanisms" has begun which should help us drive the DIRECTION
> system forward as well.
> So far, we haven't gotten into DISTRIBUTION much yet. Might I suggest we
> begin a thread on this subject, starting with the following disucssion
> a) Pull based distribution through SURROGATEs
> b) Push based pre-propolutation of individual objects to SURROGATEs
> c) Push based complete replication of objects sets to SURROGATEs
> As always, more scenarios for the
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-day-cdnp-scenarios-01.txt> ID
> will help us all in getting the architecture right.