[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Continued Poll for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds
We have seen some good support for these I-Ds and no objections, but I don't
think we have seen anything like the level of support that was evident in
the room in Philadelphia. We haven't seen support from more than half of the
authors of the documents.
So, please, if you haven't already done so, give an indication of whether or
not you support each of these four documents becoming working group drafts.
Remember, you can be in favor of some and not other if you like.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Farrel" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:23 PM
Subject: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds
From Philadelphia, we have four candidate I-Ds for adoption as CCAMP
working group documents.
Please express your opinions.
Note that acceptance of these I-Ds does not mean that the discussion about
the architecture is done. I think we made some progress on that topic in
Philadelphia, and I think the authors took on the task of making some
updates of semantics and for clarity, but I expect the discussion may go
on for a while.