[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving forward with VCAT/LCAS...
Hi CCAMPers, at the Vancouver meeting the status of the VCAT/LCAS
draft was discussed and there seemed to be two possible additions to
the requirements section of the draft. From the slide presentation
(a) Be able to set up member LSPs (and data plane LSPs -- server
connections) prior to creation of VCG (Virtual Concatenation Group).
If there are more such members would they have a relation with
each other? e.g. a "pool" of member LSPs for a single VCG or for
multiple VCGs that exist between the same end-points.
(b) “Member” LSPs (data plane and control plane) can exist after a
VCG using them has been removed.
Will they be returned to the "pool" (if the previous answer is yes).
For those interested in VCAT/LCAS what is your opinion on these
additional requirements? This is a WG draft so polling of the list is
required (right Adrian?). I'll clean up the language if there is a
desire to add these to the current draft. Note that these
requirements may break or require rework of the current "multiple
co-signaled member sets" solution in the draft.
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...