[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Closing the GELS Mailing List
attila - yes. but CCAMP is only about "Control" -
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Attila Takacs (IJ/ETH)
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 4:25 PM
> To: Adrian Farrel; email@example.com; gels
> Cc: Ross Callon
> Subject: RE: Closing the GELS Mailing List
> Hi all,
> I support closing the gels list.
> Since decoupling the discussions into "techno-specific" and GMPLS
> specific part is very difficult, if at all possible, I do not
> see how to
> benefit from a separate forum for techno-specific aspects. IMHO, it
> would be much clearer having a single forum for all related
> Best regards,
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 11:27 AM
> > To: firstname.lastname@example.org; gels
> > Cc: Ross Callon
> > Subject: Closing the GELS Mailing List
> > We propose to close the GELS mailing list.
> > Loa wrote...
> > > I tend to support this, but it begs two questions:
> > >
> > > - when will the charter update be ack'ed?
> > I don't know, and I can't promise that it will be ack'ed. but
> > the Routing ADs appear to support the change.
> > > - in the (unlikely) case where we don't get an ack for
> > gels work the
> > > gels-list won't be needed anyhow, so; isn't the effect of
> > the of your
> > > statement below that the gels-list is dead as of now? Especially
> > > since the on thing we are discussing at the moment is
> the charter
> > > update and this is on the ccamp list??
> > Absolutely.
> > I'll give you all a last chance to scream.
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian