[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gels vs. ccamp mailing list
I tend to support this, but it begs two questions:
- when will the charter update be ack'ed?
- in the (unlikely) case where we don't get an ack for
gels work the gels-list won't be needed anyhow, so;
isn't the effect of the of your statement below that
the gels-list is dead as of now? Especially since the
on thing we are discussing at the moment is the charter
update and this is on the ccamp list??
Adrian Farrel wrote:
> I am thinking to close the GELS list as soon as we have an Ack for our
> charter change.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Attila Takacs (IJ/ETH)"
> To: <email@example.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 4:46 PM
> Subject: gels vs. ccamp mailing list
> Hi Deborah and Adrian,
> an administrative question...
> Currently, there are two possibilities to carry on discussion on the
> gels work: the ccamp and the gels mailing lists. Now, that the work will
> officially put on the ccamp charter I think we should reiterate the
> discussion we had about the mailing lists.
> Specifically; should the gels list be used for all the discussion
> (including ccamp drafts on GMPLS extensions) or should all discussion go
> to the ccamp list...and maybe it is time to close the gels list?
> Thanks and best regards,
Principal Networking Architect
Acreo AB phone: +46 8 632 77 14
Isafjordsgatan 22 mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
Kista, Sweden email: firstname.lastname@example.org
This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.astaro.com