[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Polling for two new working group I-Ds
Yes to both I-Ds.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Farrel" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 11:33 PM
Subject: Polling for two new working group I-Ds
> In Chicago we considered the possibility of two new CCAMP drafts. Please
> give your opinions:
> 1. draft-chen-ccamp-isis-interas-te-extension-00.txt
> This is a partner draft to draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-00.txt
> The draft was discussed at the ISIS working group and several questions of
> detail were raised.
> Thus, accepting this I-D now, does not imply that we would not change the
> 2. draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt
> This work is a charter milestone, and Deborah and I are both co-authors, so
> we are likely to be influenced in favour of adoption. So please voice your
> opinions loud and clear.