[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IGP Extensions - CCAMP Milestones
I can't answer your question. The editors presumably can.
I hope this doesn't prevent us from making these WG documents, but rather
is a small technical point that needs to be resolved in the normal
----- Original Message -----
From: "dimitri papadimitriou" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <email@example.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: IGP Extensions - CCAMP Milestones
> could you explain the reasoning for having a TE specific TLV in the
> auto-mesh document with area and AS-wide flooding scope while the TE
> router cap TLV is restricted to an area flooding scope ? shouldn't be
> one way or the other i.e. either restrict all TE info area-local or
> allow for TE router cap TLV with AS-wide flooding scope ?
> note: there is nothing in the TE router cap TLV that would impact
> scaling more than the TE auto-mesh TLV does
> - dimitri.
> Adrian Farrel wrote:
> > Hi,
> > We have two immediate milestones to address:
> > Oct 05 First version WG I-D for Advertising TE Node Capabilities in
> > and OSPF
> > Oct 05 First version WG I-D for Automatic discovery of MPLS-TE mesh
> > membership
> > There are two personal submissions which address these topics:
> > draft-vasseur-ccamp-te-node-cap-01.txt
> > draft-vasseur-ccamp-automesh-02.txt
> > I propose that we move these into the WG and then kick the tires
> > thoroughly.
> > Opinions please.
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> > .