[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MIB Dr. review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-09.txt
Please add a note as to why the bits are reversed for the managed object.
----- Original Message -----
From: Adrian Farrel <email@example.com>
To: Tom Petch <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Thomas D. Nadeau
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: MIB Dr. review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-09.txt
> Hi Tom,
> > I am still unsure about MSB/LSB in IANAGmplsAdminStatusFlags. This has
> > (31) while RFC3471 has reflect as bit 0.
> > As Joan says, "The BITS as specified look backwards when viewing the
> > This is fine if one is MSB, the other LSB (although that might be worth
> adding a
> > note about).
> You are both right.
> We have reversed the order of the bits in the IANA MIB and also filled the
> gap with "reserved" bits.