Hi, Adrian and ccampers
I propose that we handle control plane resilience in our CCAMP charter.
I think that the CCAMP WG is focussing on the data and control planes for GMPLS.
Until now we have handled the data plane part for resilience, but we have no results of control plane resilience.
I had presented my contribution for requirements of control plane resilience through draft-kim-ccamp-cpr-reqts-00.txt last year.
On the November meeting this year, I will present an updated document of requirements for control plane resilience , and a new or extended protocol specification document for control plane resilience.
Of course, I think it's possible under the condition that the topic of control plane resilience could be handled in the CCAMP charter.
From: "Adrian Farrel" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From Date: 2005-08-16 오후 8:28:11
To: "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "'Kireeti Kompella'" <email@example.com>
Subject: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter