[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
WG drafts - My correction
Thanks to those of you who pointed out my mistake on and off the list.
To set things straight...
1. We have already accepted draft-ayyangar-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te as a
WG draft and it has been published as
2. I have seen consensus for draft-ayyangar-ccamp-lsp-stitching to be
published as a WG draft and the authors will submit it as
3. The name of the third draft is
draft-vasseur-ccamp-inter-domain-pd-path-comp. This is the draft that we
need to consider.
As JP says, he plans to add the sentence "In the context of this draft,
the node in charge of any ERO expansion within its domain is always along
the inter-domain TE LSP path" to this draft.
Question: With the addition of this sentence, are we content to accept
this draft as a WG draft?