[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: spc connections
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Ong, Lyndon wrote:
> "There is no change in protocol to enable this function,
> merely a description of how it all works."
> Hmm, well I did not see anywhere in the protocol spec
> something that states how this works at the present time.
> If you are saying the ERO processing can be extended to do this,
You are right insofar as 3473 is concerned; however, see my previous
mail. It would be great to get your feedback on issues you find.
> but from the previous messages a separate object
> seems like a good approach, plus it would be consistent
> with G.7713.2.
<ccamp chair hat on>
Being consistent with G.7713.2 isn't at the top of my list until the
many issues with 7713.2 are cleared up. Being consistent with 3473 is
at the very top of my list. Reusing objects defined in 3473 (which is
an IETF Standards Track document), and more fully explaining their
processing where needed is exactly what CCAMP should be doing.