[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
Note that Loa is correct as to the impact of liasions, I-Ds
or presentations by folk representing otehr SDOs within the IETF
standards process - they carry just as much weight as the statemnts
of any individual and there is currently no reason to have them
treated as having some special status in the change-process ID.
(see RFC 3356 sec 3.2.2 & RFC 2418 sec 1)) That said, I do think it would be
good to mention that the use of liasion statements is common in other
SDOs and that such statements should be not ignored when directed to
IETF working groups.
There are strong arguments that maybe the current assumptions
should change butthis mailing list is not the place to discuss it - I
would suggest that this dicussion be redirected to the problem-statement