[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
> (a) it should be a WG document?
> (b) it's good stuff, but not ready?
> (c) we need a new start?
> With all the issues raised by Neil, Sharham, Dave, and others the document
> is definitely not ready.
in most wgs, if it is not a wg document we don't discuss it in the wg.
if it is ready, we give it to the iesg.
wgs exist to make in-charter documents ready. otherwise the iesg would
just process individual submissions.