[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
We know it, and updated version will be free from "re-documentation"
of Sonet/SDH. This why we call such a document a draft isn't it ?
Randy Bush wrote:
> > I don't know if it is necessary to redescribe SDH/SONET processing in an
> > IETF document. I would prefer references to the appropriate SDH standards;
> > otherwise you get different specifications and people get confused.
> you are being too polite. it is anethema to redocument sdh/sonet here.
> it feels to me that too much of the recent sdh/sonet discussion really
> belongs in the itu.
tel;home:+32 2 3434361
tel;work:+32 3 2408491
org:Alcatel Bell;IPO NA (NSG) - Antwerpen
title:Optical Networking R&S - Senior Engineer
adr;quoted-printable:;;Francis Wellesplein, 1=0D=0AB-2018 Antwerpen;;;;BELGIUM