[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving right along ...
> At this very late stage, since this not bringing any new functionality, and
> since the label structure is very stable since a long time, I would prefer
> not to restart a long technical discussion to change and re-validate the
This label issue is brought up many months ago already and strongly supported by
multiple people. So far it has been rejected by you, and thus not included. The
label structure isn't stable as such since a long time... there was simply a
rejection to properly adapt it.
For me and other SDH/SONET folks it is of utmost importance to see SDH and SONET
be treated similarly, as also reflected in the ITU-T and T1 specifications for
these technologies. In my opinion the current text in the draft must be adapted
as proposed by Juergen (and by me and others in the past as well).
tel;cell:+31 62 061 3945
tel;fax:+31 35 687 5976
tel;home:+31 35 526 5463
tel;work:+31 35 687 4270
org:Optical Network Group;Lucent Technologies Nederland
title:Consulting Member of Technical Staff
adr;quoted-printable:;;Botterstraat 45=0D=0A=0D=0A;1271 XL Huizen;;;The Netherlands