[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Drafts update
Is there any reason why you skipped number 4? Here's my answers
to 1-3 and 5-6...
1. Yes, CCAMP
2. Wait to hear why this is a 'common control and management plane'
issue as opposed to an optical networking specific issue.
5. Wait until after London meeting to gauge its acceptance there
> Hi Folks,
> Can we get a sense of the consensus whether the following drafts
> should be made CCAMP WG documents? Please respond with
> (a) yes
> (b) no
> (c) wait
> 1. draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt
> 2. draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-00.txt
> 3. draft-kompella-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt
> 5. draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt
> 6. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-routing-00.txt
> (Note: for draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt, the question is, should this
> be a WG document, either in MPLS or CCAMP.)