[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> > > It should be fine to provide a object that names a specific node as a
> > > special case of the detour object, and may be (is) needed to
> > > accommodate existing code. It might be useful to have a form of the
> > > detour object that covered the link disjoint special case. There
> > > should also be a form of the detour object that allows the more
> > > general list of SRLG.
> > >
> > > SRLG should also be considered in the "Detour Path Computation
> > > Algorithm" section.
> > Sure. Thanks!
> So you'll add one or two Objects to cover SRLG, and possible the link
> disjoint special case.
Let me check with other folks here. We have shipped the restoration
feature for a while, and providers have deployed it. So we have to be
careful. Please understand.